Welcome to the CSAE Blog

Click here to return to the CSAE Blog main feed.

Implement a Digital Governance Strategy Within Your Association

Implement a Digital Governance Strategy Within Your Association

By Randall Craig

Most associations have had a lifetime of experience with governance, and over that lifetime governance generally improves and becomes more sophisticated. But what about digital governance – the ground rules and process of managing and aligning the increasingly important public face of the organization, along with the underlying technology?

In the olden days, “digital” meant getting a computer on your desk and learning how to use newfangled spreadsheets or word processing programs. At some point later, “digital” meant email. Today, it encompasses the broad range of technologies from the web, to social media, to marketing automation, CRM, mobile, and more. It encompasses internal collaboration, external marketing, and member engagement. It informs, engages, transacts, and for the most forward-thinking organizations, it transforms. Digital consumes a large and growing investment in technology and plays a core role in marketing. Yes, digital has grown up, but in many organizations, digital governance has not.
 
There are two approaches to digital governance: central and decentralized. Central governance recognizes that the fast pace of digital requires a separate governance structure, along with a separate, unencumbered execution arm. Decentralized governance recognizes that digital must be completely integrated into the organization’s existing structures and processes. Both have merit; which approach makes most sense for your organization depends on your history, strategy, and capabilities.

Here is how they are typically implemented:

  • Central governance: Two groups are set up: a digital steering committee that would be responsible for keeping apprised of trends, organizational strategy, and setting the direction for web, social media, etc. This group would meet semi-annually or annually. The second group, a digital working group, is the arms and legs that execute the plan. Depending on your organization’s size and budget, the digital working group can be a separate department, or it can be housed within IT, marketing, or outsourced fully or partially. The digital working group provides on-the-ground input to the steering committee, and develops reports that track the effectiveness of its efforts.
     
  • Decentralized governance: With this model, each group in the organization is responsible for planning and executing digital within the context of their real-world accountabilities. For example, an HR person would execute an online recruitment strategy as part of their overall recruitment strategy. Or a member service person would integrate Twitter monitoring and response into their overall member service strategy. In this approach, the marketing and technology groups function in a shared service model, providing functional expertise and delivery capability when required.

Which governance model is best? Either works – the important thing is that your organization has actually put digital governance into place. That being said, as the organization matures, so should the governance, ultimately moving to a third approach, one that recognizes the benefits of both: strategic governance.

Strategic governance recognizes that not every group within the organization may be as “plugged in” digitally, and that there is merit in a central digital steering committee that can channel sharing, education, and digital innovation. The steering committee is also responsible for ensuring alignment with overall strategy. Yet unlike central governance, individual departments are expected to take responsibility for driving innovation within their own group: after all, who knows their mandate better? And who would be most aware of best practices in their functional areas?

With strategic governance, digital execution would be a hybrid: some tasks are delegated to a working committee, as is the case with central governance, and other tasks are executed by people within each department. As an example, search engine optimization might be handled by the working group, but online event registration might be handled directly by a person within the event department.

This week’s action plan: Governance does not need to be complex, nor time-consuming – it just needs to be done. This week, look at your digital governance model and be more intentional: if you don’t have one, choose a model that works. If you do, what steps can you take to be more strategic with it?


Randall Craig is the author of seven books including the Online PR and Social Media, the Everything Guide to Starting an Online Business, and Digital Transformation for Associations. He has been helping organizations rethink their approach to marketing and engagement using digital since 1994.

Related

Tags

Governance, Boards

Categories

Education, Guest Contributor, Web / Technology

Share

Rating

0 ( 0 reviews)

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Blog
Name

Whitelist csae@csae.com to ensure subscription notices arrive in your inbox.

Spot a typo? Email steven@csae.com.

Want to Contribute?

CSAE is looking for people from the Association Community who want to share their passion, interest, and advice with their peers via CSAE content channels.

This is an opportunity to help others and increase exposure for yourself and your association.

Categories
  • Uncategorized
  • CSAE Speaks
  • Education
  • Events
  • Membership
  • Op-Ed
  • Marketing
  • Publications
  • Guest Contributor
  • Web / Technology
Tags